"Question first, Mirandize later"
Two out of three Judges on the Second District Court of Appeals followed the United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. Seibert (2004), 542 U.S. 600, because a defendant was subjected to custodial interrogation before Miranda warnings were administered and then - once the "cat was out of the bag" - she was transported to the police station where she waived her Miranda rights and confirmed what she already admitted pre-Miranda. Though the detective elicited more detail in the second interview, the content of the interrogations was the same, it was the same detective both times, and the second interview was "merely a continuation of the pre-Miranda interview initiated by Detective Smith at the crime scene." Read the decision in State v. Yvonne D. Cook, 2012-Ohio-111, here.
If you are accused of a crime or have been convicted already, contact me if you can afford to hire a private criminal defense lawyer. Otherwise, contact your county or state public defender to see if they can help.
Contact me 24/7 by sending an email to ohiocriminalappealslawyer@gmail.com