Plea bargains have been reached in Ohio courts forever. And defendants have not been complaining. What if you were facing a felony of the second degree and the State was willing to let you plead to an amended charge which was a felony of the fifth degree? Would you take the deal? Maybe. There are several factors for you and your lawyer to consider. But in the case of State v. Rohrbaugh, the Third District Court of Appeals took it upon itself to reverse a case where the State amended a charge and allowed the defendant to plead to the amended charge. The Third District pointed out that the Ohio Constitution and Criminal Rule 7 both require an indictment in a felony case. And Rule 7(D) states you cannot amend the crime charged if a change is made to the name or identity of the crime. So when the Third District Court of Appeals saw that the State amended a charge to which the defendant pled - and no waiver of the defendant's right to an indictment was made - there was an "obvious defect" that required reversal. But the Ohio Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals and held that "a defendant may plead guilty to an indictment that was amended to change the name or identity of the charged crime when the defendant is represented by counsel, has bargained for the amendment, and is not prejudiced by the change." Read the Third District Court of Appeals decision here, or the Ohio Supreme Court decision here.
Subscribe
Contact Me 24/7 Using This Form
Search
Topics
- one of my WINS ON APPEAL (23)
- Choosing a lawyer on appeal (7)
- 4th Amendment (automobile) (9)
- 4th Amendment (non-automobile) (13)
- 5th Amendment (Miranda) (5)
- 6th Amendment (Right to Counsel) (3)
- Abuse of Discretion (10)
- Allied Offenses of Similar Import (7)
- ANDERS Briefs (2)
- Batson v. Kentucky (2)
- Brady Violations (1)
- Capital Cases (1)
- Closing Argument (1)
- Community Control (probation) (3)
- Competecy of Witnesses (1)
- competency to stand trial (2)
- Confessions (1)
- Confrontation Clause (3)
- consent (1)
- Costs (3)
- Criminal Appeals (generally) (22)
- Criminal Rule 7 (1)
- Criminal Rule 11 (6)
- Criminal Rule 32 (1)
- Criminal Rule 43 (1)
- double jeopardy (1)
- Due Process (5)
- Expedited Review (2)
- Expungement (3)
- Evidence (manifest weight) (1)
- Evidence (Sufficiency) (21)
- Evidence Rule 404 (4)
- Evidence Rule 612 (1)
- final appealable order (5)
- Fines (2)
- Forfeiture (1)
- Guilty Pleas (12)
- H.B. 86 (8)
- Harmless Error (1)
- Hearsay (5)
- ILC (intervention in lieu of conviction) (3)
- Indictment (5)
- Indigent Defendants (1)
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (2)
- Judicial Conduct (1)
- Judicial Release (4)
- Jury (6)
- Jury Instructions (5)
- Jury Waiver (1)
- Law of the Case Doctrine (1)
- Lesser Included Offenses (3)
- lie detector tests (1)
- Local Crime News (45)
- mistrial (1)
- motions to withdraw pleas (4)
- musings (2)
- No Contest Pleas (4)
- Notice of Appeal (3)
- Ohio Appellate Rule 9(A) (1)
- Ohio Supreme Court Update (24)
- Pandering obscenity (1)
- petition for a writ of habeas corpus (1)
- Plea Bargains (5)
- Postconviction relief petition (1)
- Post-release control (11)
- Prosecutorial Misconduct (2)
- Public Records (1)
- Reasonable doubt (1)
- res judicata (1)
- Restitution (2)
- RVO Specification (1)
- Search Warrants (1)
- sentencing (generally) (9)
- sentences (inconsistent) (2)
- Sex Offenders (1)
- Speedy Trial (3)
- Stay (1)
- stare decisis (2)
- statute of limitations (1)
- Supreme Court of the United States update (3)
- Traffic Stops (1)
- Transitional Control (1)
- Transcript (3)
- Venue (1)
- Verdict Forms (4)
- Writs (1)
Recent Entries
Oct 14, 11 05:00 PM Attorney Disbarred for Child Rape Conviction Today the Ohio Supreme Court disbarred Ohio attorney Joseph Norman Williams from the practice of...
Oct 13, 11 12:49 PM The Ohio Supreme Court Modifies the Requirements for a Final Appealable Order Today, in State v. Lester, 2011-Ohio-5204, the Ohio Supreme Court modified what constitutes a "final...
Oct 11, 11 12:42 PM Who robbed whom? James Heflin, Jr., is accused of felonious assault, a weapons violation, and murder, in the...
Oct 7, 11 11:18 PM House Bill 86 brings back fact finding for stacking Judge Rastatter took guilty pleas from a defendant on one count of rape and two...
Oct 7, 11 06:52 PM Failure to provide written transcript results in loss for Appellant The State appealed a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress evidence. The prosecutor...
Oct 6, 11 11:09 AM Writ of Procedendo Issued Roy Duncan is serving time in North Central Correctional Institution. He filed a Motion for...
Monthly Archives
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (25)
- August 2011 (14)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (20)
- May 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (17)
- February 2011 (6)
- January 2011 (7)
- December 2010 (11)
- November 2010 (3)
- October 2010 (6)
- September 2010 (14)
- August 2010 (18)
- July 2010 (18)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (10)
- February 2010 (5)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (7)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (7)
- September 2009 (8)
- August 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (7)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (8)
- March 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (2)
- November 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (1)
- November 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (1)
- March 2006 (2)
- July 2005 (1)
- November 2003 (1)
Legal Blogs
- Gamso - For The Defense Blog (Jeff Gamso)
- Ohio Criminal Appeals Lawyer Blog (Robert Alan Brenner)